Good Morning World Wide Web,
There are several conversation going on. The conversation in this YouTube video ended well, but can Talib really walk into a room of reporters or scholars and give his insight? Will they listen to him? If you go to any news outlet now and type Ferguson MO into the search bar, there will be some results. What took place with the shooting death of unarmed black teen Mike Brown has sparked conversations across race, cultures and the color lines. It’s good to see the dialogue. Some of them have great points. Others not so much.
I think we can all agree that a real conversation is overdue. Personally, I attempted to find some key stakeholders and bring people together almost naïvely hoping that through a series of talking we could get started. I don’t expect that a simple conversation or a series will change anything immediately. The one thing I know is that a conversation will be a step in the right direction. Real conversations.
In my neck of the woods we’re calling on the collegiate community; the scholars. I’m not opposed to the participation of people who’ve chosen to mount up their debt and excel at standardized testing for cramming 12 weeks of material about an array of subject, but I think conversations need dichotomy. Instead what you find are important narratives become more political in nature where there’s a top down approach. Listen, I get it! Your student loan bill, title and socioeconomic status places you higher on the food chain, but where you go home and the person who has a tomorrow interest in what happens today aren’t equal. Ideally Ferguson should be discussing Ferguson and inviting who they’d like to the table. Instead societal norms and “buzz words” have created efficiency in not having conversations but hosting trends. I’m literally getting in line for a title myself. I respect the process. We have a great country and some of our greatest leaders have advanced education. I don’t want to sound as though I’m discounting education. I’ve decided to go back so that I can make a difference. I can’t rap,sing, play football, basketball or any of those other groovy sports to get a platform quicker. I’m about 18k in now and counting. I’m assuming my voice will cost me another 10k just to get in the ring. Reality is not a 3 month class. It’s real, and until there are real stakeholders at the table, it is my opinion that nothing will ever truly be resolved. A combination of knowledge and experience are the perfect bowl of punch.
There might be someone who asks, “What is Ferguson Missouri? ” “What is there to care about?” Well…. 1st off Ferguson Missouri is a place in the mid western region of the US. What took place is the reason so many major news outlets in the US are now shining a light on a problem deeply engraved in American culture.
On August 9, 2014 an 18-year-old black male named Michael “Mike” Brown and his 22-year-old friend Dorian Johnson visited Ferguson Market and Liquor shortly after noon. The exact details around what happened inside of the store are unclear but there is an ongoing narrative and investigation. A Ferguson police officer responded to a call made by a customer alleging there had been a robbery. Responding to the robbery was a “white male” police officer who shot the young black male “Mike” Brown multiple times and he was “unarmed.” There have been a total of 3 autopsies and a myriad of investigations surrounding this particular incident. So many things took place after this incident that I would need multiple blog posts to go into detail. ( Please see info on Mike Brown or Ferguson MO via search engine of your choice)
If you are a regular visitor to this site, you know that the atmosphere is very open. There’s a glossary literally giving real definitions of race and even discussion surrounding the terms and why they are important. What I’ve come to notice is that people really aren’t interested in the biological factors and definitions. If solving our issues were as easy as teaching someone terms we would no longer have a problem. People want to know about the everyday interactions with family, relationships, friends, co-workers and etc. But why should people who aren’t racially “black or African-American” care about this incident? Why would people who are racially “black or African-American” care? Part of the reason there’s a misunderstanding about “why” is that “mainstream media” does an absolutely poor job of covering the depth and complexities of racism. There’s race, ethnicity, culture, colorism and an eternity of other variables. Most of the time the only incidents that you hear about is when someone who is famous is “intentionally racist.” The fact that there is structural and institutional racism that is the very thread of America is often ignored. There is a systematic approach to covering what “seems” to be important rather than what we should actually be paying attention to. I’ll bet that no one has turned on the news and heard terms like, “structural racism or institutional racism.” Often you’re only going to hear individual occurences of “racial profiling or voter suppression and other personal prejudices. There’s this term “minority” that everyone who is “non-white” has heard to describe themselves. It seems to just toss all the crabs into a bucket except for the “blue” ones.
This individual occurrence, although it’s one of many very unique incidents that happen everyday, allows the world to actually take a look at structural and institutional racism. Individual groups with specific collective interests can then decide how Court rulings will affect them. We need that collectivism. Because this incident has garnered international attention, it’s hard to ignore that there will be lingering conversations and opportunities to focus on the root causes of racism. It effects everyone differently but there are effects. For the people who check “other” as their race, it could be a very unique affect, but it’s almost guaranteed to reach you on a personal level because more than likely you could be “non-white” exclusively.
As this project grows and more collaborations are made I hope to shed a unique light so that we can see where and how the faces of particular demographics are represented.
Please take a look and listen to the narrative from a reliable source that is representative of your values. I’m certain you’ll find that the narrative if reliable will illustrate that structural and institutional racism is far-reaching.
The Civil Rights Movement was an effort, among many things, to overturn segregation, commonly known as Jim Crow legislation. Throughout the Jim Crow South (1890-1960), state laws required blacks and whites to use separate facilities, attend different schools, sit in different places in theaters and buses, and even to be buried in different areas in cemeteries—to draw only four illustrations from various cases. As early as the 1930s, African Americans protested these laws. In Greensboro, black ministers boycotted the War Memorial Auditorium’s opening, and young people there started a theater boycott. Lumberton youth marched to protest a lack of educational opportunities. Meanwhile during the twentieth century, municipality leaders, including Charlotteans, used local ordinances to create residential segregation.
The Civil Rights Movement, as it commonly known, began in the 1950s. In 1954, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its Brown decision, and schools were ordered to desegregate. For some time North Carolina avoided compliance, with various creative ideas such as the Pearsall Plan. Meanwhile in the 1950s, North Carolina blacks started what would become known as sit –ins. In 1957 seven blacks, for example, demanded service in the white section of a Durham ice cream parlor.
In 1960, a series of events occurred in North Carolina and began the Civil Rights Movement in earnest. The Greensboro Sit-In occurred in North Carolina, and this demonstration gained national attention and set an example for others to follow throughout the Jim Crow South. Four N.C. A & T State University students walked to the downtown Woolworth’s store in Greensboro, sat in the white section of the store’s restaurant, and demanded service. In time, more and more students started protesting in Greensboro and protests spread to Raleigh. In the capital city, Shaw University and St. Augustine’s College students carried out sit-ins at various stores. At other time, college students picketed stores. Picketers, in one instance, were arrested at Cameron Village. Although storeowners initially resisted accommodating the blacks, they eventually complied for legal and economic purposes.
Several organizations helped organize and energize the Civil Rights Movement. The Congress of Racial Equality (CORE) sponsored the Freedom Rides in 1961; black and white bus riders boarded Greyhounds and Trailways buses and challenged segregation on the buses and in the bus stations. In North Carolina, the riders experienced no violent resistance. The following year, the organization led a successful campaign against Howard Johnson’s restaurants. During the mid-1960s and under the leadership of Floyd B. McKissick, a Durham attorney, CORE embraced black nationalism. The Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee (SNCC), like CORE, evolved into a more confrontational group. Ella Baker of Raleigh trained students to live in the rural South and to participate in task forces assigned to educate rural blacks and register them to vote. In the mid-1960s, student enthusiasm waned for the nonviolent approach, but under the leadership of Stokely Carmichael, student interest revived as the organization promoted black nationalism and black power. The National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP), a legal arm of the Civil Rights Movement, worked to ensure that the law was applied in a nondiscriminatory manner. Reginald Hawkins was a prominent leader. Kelly Alexander reorganized the Charlotte NAACP chapter and emerged as one of the Tar Heel State’s leading civil rights leaders during the 1950s and 1960s. Ministers led the Southern Leadership Conference (SCLC), an influential organization that consistently employed nonviolent means. A well-known North Carolina SCLC leader was Golden Aros Franks; he led various protests in eastern North Carolina towns.
Although Kenneth R. Williams served on the Winston Salem Board of Aldermen during the late 1940s, North Carolina blacks, as a voting bloc, lost political power during the late 1890s and lacked political power, until the passage of national legislation such as the Voting Rights Act. After blacks regained their suffrage rights, more and more blacks could run for political office and were elected to public office. Others were appointed to public office. Henry E. Frye, for example, was appointed to the North Carolina Supreme Court and became the first African American to serve in that capacity.
Jeffrey J. Crow, Paul D. Escott, and Flora J. Hatley, A History of African American in North Carolina(Raleigh, 2002).
Related Categories: Education, Civil Rights Movement, African American
Related Encyclopedia Entries: Reginald Hawkins (1923-2007), Henry E. Frye (1932- ) , Restrictive covenants, Residential segregation, Dorothy Counts (1942- ), Griggs v. Duke Power, Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education, Greensboro Sit-In, North Carolina Mutual Life, Kenneth R. Williams (1912-1989), Voting Rights Act of 1965, Greensboro Shootings, Robert Franklin Williams (1925-1996), SNCC (Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee)., Ella Baker ( 1903 – 1986), Appeal to the Coloured Citizens of the World, David Walker (1785 – 1830), Incidents in the Life of a Slave Girl, Aaron McDuffie Moore (1863-1923), Harriet Jacobs (1813-1897) , Leonard Medical School,Concerned Parents Association, Secret Basketball Game of 1944, Claude Sitton (1925-), Soul City,Charles B. Aycock (1859-1912), Wilson Carey (1831-1905?), Robeson County (1787), The Freedmen’s Conventions, Charlotte Hawkins Brown (1883-1961), Simkins v. Cone (1963)
Related Commentary: Speaker Ban Law, Frederick Douglass Re-emerging As American Icon, Success of Postwar Freedmen A Worthy Study for Historians